Sunday, July 19, 2009
Wednesday, February 4, 2009
Who are we kidding?
Its not as if this peculiar malady has escaped the other stratas of India's chaotic billions. Getting access to power by hook or by crook comes first. When the time comes to execute power, most of India's politicians fail the peter parker test. What they are great at, is acting offended. What professionals! Their most common refuge is to act incensed at the 'violation' of their culture of which they know scant little. Culture and religion (read Hinduism) are such efficient masks for inefficiency, the lack of talent and colossal apathy. It's a shame that so many supposed future leaders of India are firm worshipers at the altar of identity politics. They don't spare us their rhetoric even during times of crisis.
Hinduism as a religion has ceased to exist. All thats left in its place are caste and shallow morality. When I hear about the kind of caste related atrocities that occur in India I can't help feeling that Hinduism wasn't all that ahead of its time like so many people claim it was, if its fathers found it necessary to differentiate people on the basis of their work, what they ate and their colour. Apartheid takes place in India. It's somehow managed to remain one of India's best kept secrets. The world community is still quite oblivious to the inhuman treatment of dalits in India. If you're a part of the upper caste and you don't think you're biased think twice. Racism is ingrained in everyone in India.
I still believe in Indian democracy. There are some really good people waiting for a chance to make some real change. For them to make a difference in our fickle society requires us to be patient so as to let their decisions bear fruit.
If you've read this post and you're Indian then you've already typecast me as belonging to a particular community. My only answer to you is to say that I don't belong anywhere and I don't want to belong anywhere. Identity is a myth. We're all same.
Wednesday, August 13, 2008
A Diseased Society

Such reactions make it impossible for a person with the disease to even attempt testing themselves for it, leave alone making their condition known to the people around them. This hostility limits the effectiveness of AIDS related awareness programs in India and can be attributed to the general levels of knowledge about HIV and AIDS and in particular to the causes of AIDS and the routes of HIV transmission. Most people are aware of how serious the illness is. They are also aware that as of now, there is no cure. What they do not know is that it isn’t easily transmitted, that with the right medication, people can live out their natural lifespan with HIV and die of natural causes. HIV isn’t the death sentence it was 10 to 15 years ago. The possibility of finding a cure is imminent. There is no need to fear it to the extent of neglecting, rejecting and denying the existence of people with HIV. Nevertheless, it is a disease to be extremely wary of, a disease that commands constant vigilance. It’s a single act of imprudence that alters your life forever.
Owing to the extra baggage that comes with being HIV positive- that of why, how and when-, coping with the disease is emotionally very difficult. People with HIV have to face discrimination from quarters they never expected to turn against them. Studies have documented HIV/AIDS- related Discrimination, Stigmatization and Denial in contexts such as the family, the community, the health care system, and the workplace. Discriminatory restrictions have also been reported in relation to travel, migration, insurance and health benefits. Family responses to infected relatives are heavily influenced by the community perception of the disease. The family may fear social isolation and hence may insist on concealing the diagnosis thus straining relationships within the family as well affecting the overall analysis of the extent of the epidemic. People with HIV are incorrectly perceived to be a source of infection to others by just being in their presence. Such myths are fuelled by misconceptions regarding the transmission of the virus. Many people believe that mosquito bites, sharing toilet seats and swimming pools with people with HIV would endanger them as well. These beliefs are completely misconstrued and should not be encouraged.
The internet is replete with websites offering every sort of information about HIV and AIDS, from the initial symptoms, to the means of contracting the illness to counselling for people infected with the virus as well as advice columns that answer every bizarre, outlandish and farfetched anxiety of people who are afraid that they have HIV. In India, government hospitals in every state provide free counselling and guidance for people who fear they have contracted the infection or people who are trying to cope with it, under the guidance of the National AIDS Control Organisation.
And yet HIV/AIDS remains a very real threat to the survival of the human species, if global warming, nuclear warfare and terrorism don’t kill us first. The speed with which it is spreading is of growing concern to governments all around the World. In India alone, the incidence of HIV infections is projected to be around 20- 25 million by 2010 (UNAIDS, 2002). India has the second largest population of individuals with HIV/AIDS although it lags behind Sub-Saharan countries quite substantially in this regard. What could possibly be the reason behind such an epidemic? In my opinion, this epidemic has been primarily caused by the inability of the average Indian to talk about taboo topics such as sex, infidelity and drug abuse. Even sex workers find it difficult to talk to each other about sex and HIV. They find it easier to talk to an outsider as they feel that foreigners aren’t restricted by the same social mores and rules (Interview with Raney Aronson, Frontline, June 2004). Such denial discourages people from getting tested thus endangering all the people they get involved with at later dates, from talking about their infection and from leading normal lives if they are indeed infected.
It appears that HIV is an infection that exposes the hypocrisy of society. The HIV epidemic in India has brought out several issues in Indian society that have always been known to have existed but have never been acknowledged. One such issue is that of the sale of young girls into prostitution. What sort of desperation and poverty would force a father to sell his daughter into prostitution? If we are to combat this epidemic we have to acknowledge several negative aspects of our society that though unpleasant, exist nonetheless. Once we overcome this barrier we may be able to contain the spread of this deadly disease that robs a person of their dignity and peace of mind while forcing them to face the reality of their existence, that they have lived in ignorance of, for all their ‘healthy’ life, – that of their inevitable death, from AIDS or otherwise. In actuality, HIV isn't really a death sentence, it's just a way to make a shorter period of your life count for more.
Tuesday, August 12, 2008
The Indian dream
It’s every teenager’s dream to board a gleaming plane to study in a land far away where students from all over the world come to study. The United Kingdom, The United States of America or Australia are the study destinations most students prefer. Developed countries hold a lot of allure for students from the third world. They represent a standard of living and an obscene level of affluence that the youth of all third world countries aspire for and hope to bring to their own homeland. Despite this prevailing trend, we find that a large population of students choose to come to India for further studies. You heard me right! India, with its corrupt officials, spit streaked streets and steady supply of impoverished villagers crowding city streets, who resort to begging in their desperation to survive, is the desired destination for students from Mauritius, Srilanka, Iran, Iraq, Bangladesh, Bhutan, Nepal, Afghanistan and several African nations apart from others. But why India? “We have heard that it’s a good country to study Law, Medicine and Business Studies in, besides, I have two elder sisters and both of them have studied in India. They are doing very well back home,” says Stephen Kimundi of Kenya who has spent several years in Pune and has enjoyed his stay here considerably. Wahid Hamidy of Afghanistan came to India on an ICCR scholarship and plans on finishing his MBA and returning to his country to help rebuild it. Says Kazi Asaduzzaman of Bangladesh, “I came to India because there is a lot of student politics in my country. Here there’s a lot more freedom.”
As I discovered on the unique occasion of International Student’s Day celebrated by Symbiosis University on July 31, Pune city plays host to a multitude of cultures of people from all over the world. Dr S B Majumdar, the president of the University, decided to put aside one day of the year to celebrate this diversity and to give students, far away from their home, a chance to feel welcomed and taken care of. Says Hamidy, “Dr Majumdar sees everyone as equal irrespective of race, class or caste. In fact the name of his institution itself signifies this mindset of his. In a society we have to respect each other since we are a part of each other.” Mr Hamidy, has resided in Pune for several years now and was awarded the Most Outstanding International Student award for this year. Apart from Symbiosis, several colleges in the city attract international students. It isn’t for nothing that Pune is called the Oxford of the east.
However, does Pune live up to its reputation? Is it hospitable to students? Says Kimundi “I love Pune. I have visited Mumbai too but I didn’t like it as its pollution, crowds and traffic were too much for me to handle.” Although Pune may be marginally better than Mumbai when it comes to traffic or pollution, do the citizens of Pune treat foreign students like outsiders or do they exhibit an attitude of atithi devo bhava to their foreign friends?
Carrying the hopes and dreams of their countries, most of the time these bright students tackle more than just their studies when they land in India. It’s a struggle to get the smallest of things done. Getting themselves registered at the police station, finding a decent place to stay or even catching an auto becomes an ordeal since they look different and talk differently. People try to cheat them at every step. Unfortunately racism isn’t just a phenomenon in the west. Our obsession with fair skin (as made evident with just a perfunctory glance at the matrimonial column in our local paper) has made us adopt a superior attitude, (akin to that of the British towards us) towards people from African nations who as a race are darker than us. “We do find that Indians favour fair skinned people. Sometimes people stare at us but we have learnt to ignore people who taunt us and talk negatively. Every society has its pros and cons. The positive aspect of India is that we also have many friends from all over the city, who are willing to help us out,” says Kimundi. While students from Africa face a problem of looking different, students from Bangladesh and the Middle East are discriminated against because they talk differently. “Language is a problem for us in the beginning. Even our pronunciations mark us out as foreigners. The more time we spend here however, the less trouble we get into,” says Asaduzzaman. Hamidy has given some thought to this issue. He says, “Most often, people who are ignorant about who we are and where we have come from, treat us differently. Rickshaw drivers, policemen and landlords try to cheat us but our classmates and professors treat us very well.” These seem to be problems every student faces when they go to a new place. In fact, Pune seems to be quite in tune with the culture and needs of an international student community. Is the rest of India the same way?
Pune is a city that accepts the cultural differences of an international student community, hence it can be said that it consists of a tolerant society. However, our tolerance is always under threat. If a person finds a headscarf offensive today, they might find jeans offensive tomorrow. The narrow line between discipline and dictatorship is often trespassed in the name of morality. As global citizens we mustn’t try to enforce our views on people. We must understand, empathise and refrain from making a judgment for as along as possible.
We live in a globalised world. Boundaries are becoming meaningless. Warfare can take any form and often economic sanctions prove to be more fatal than a war with tanks and missiles. In such a situation it is important for us to be sensitive to and aware of the differences we share with people all over the world. Although racism in our country stems more from ignorance than from malice or hatred towards a particular race, as a society, ignorance can’t be our excuse anymore.
by Shivani Bail
Monday, August 11, 2008
My Bro
My brother first learnt how to say no to me when he was around eight and I was eleven. If you ask me, it was too early. I can just imagine how his tiny monkey brain must have evolved into a human one and realised that I was probably violating his right to equal pepsi, equal cake, equal TV watching time and equal space on the bike ride with my mom back from school. By the time I had realised this change it was too late to go back. I was stuck with a monster who constantly fought with me for space and for attention from my parents. Being the elder child I would always try to protect my parents and I always felt that he was too selfish to understand them and that he had too many demands. How I used to lecture him and try to make him ‘good’.
Before I realised it, time went by and both of us grew up. Our troubles stopped revolving around each other. We started understanding and facing adult problems of crumbling relationships, mortality and money. Although we found different ways to cope with our struggles they only seemed to bring us closer. Now that I live far away from him, I still feel like calling him whenever I feel low and with the same wit that he had when he was three, he makes me laugh and forget my sadness. It is as though we finally figured out that after our parents, we had only each other, to relive our memories of the glorious years we spent as carefree children in the Garden of Eden that was our home.
by Shivani Bail
Saturday, August 9, 2008
Remebering Ingmar Bergman - An Interview with Gunnar Bergdahl

An artist of cinema, Bergman is often considered to have pioneered the recognition of film as a medium that exposed the complexities of the human condition as eloquently and sensitively as perhaps literature and theatre succeeded in doing. In an attempt to understand more about Bergman’s creative genius, we interviewed his close friend and colleague Gunnar Bergdahl who was invited by Palador to conduct a workshop for film students and filmmakers in Mumbai this week.
“We had a nice friendship based on our common interests in film. We first conversed over the phone around fifteen years ago. When I was at a crossroad in my career I asked him for advice. He told me to become a director but I became a magazine editor instead. Maybe I should have become a director,” laughs Bergdahl, adding, “He was always very generous with his time and advice. I do believe he liked me,” while reminiscing his time spent with the cinema great.
Bergman inspired countless directors from the likes of Krzysztof KieÅ›lowski and Andrei Tarkovsky to even the more commercial Steven Spielberg and Wes Craven. Undoubtedly his complex screenplays, coupled with his intense frames laden with symbolism made him a favourite amongst serious filmmakers but what was that particular trait that made him the powerhouse of creativity he was? Bergdahl replied almost imediately, “His curiosity and his childlike innocence are what made him great. He looked at the world through the eyes of a younger, child Bergman. Once when I asked him why he was watching so many films and wasn’t he was getting tired, he told me, film is an expanding universe, the more you look the more you find. This is the kind of curiosity that set him apart. His genius is evident in his films. Although they are a bit old fashioned in their appearance, the themes they convey are universal like those of faith, death and human suffering.”
When asked what his favourite work of Bergman was, Bergdahl says “If I had to choose from all his films I would say that Persona was his best work. It was a personal story that was outspoken and memorable with a clear point.” Finally we asked Bergdahl what he thought of the Indian film industry. “I don’t think I am in the position to comment on this subject as I have seen only a few Indian films. I have watched the Apu Trilogy and films by Adur Gopalakrishnan amongst others. However I will say this, Sweden is a small country of nine million and India is a country of nine hundred million. If we produced one Ingmar Bergman, you should be able to produce a hundred,” was his surprising reply. A sentiment we undoubtedly share.
by Shivani Bail
Pic Courtesy Palador Pictures - A still from Through a Glass Darkly. The first movie of what is considered to be Bergman's 'faith' trilogy.
Thursday, August 7, 2008
Soul Talk - Shreya Ghoshal

“For the last few films I have worked on, I have been paired with artistes I haven’t worked with in the past. For Singh is King, I have sung a subtle, romantic song with a slight Punjabi folk flavour along with Rahat Fateh Ali khan and I have sung a song with Mohit Chauhan in Kismat Konnection,” says Shreya who enjoys the experience of trying out new avenues to reinvent herself. Her versatility reveals itself through her work. She has sung songs for two animated films (Ghatothkach and Dashavatar) and is as big a sensation in the Tamil film industry as she is in the Hindi industry. She renders songs in languages unknown to her with just as much soul and emotion as she does in her other songs. However, often audiences feel that her soothing and sweet voice would not suit a fast paced, racy song. Has she become stereotyped? Smiling to hear her voice be described in this way, Shreya says, “I like the fact that audiences find my voice soothing. Personally speaking, I love singing soulful songs so I don’t mind being stereotyped. However, I think people often get confused between the tempo and texture of a song. Yeh Ishq Hai from Jab We Met and the recently released Aahista Aahista from Bachna Ae haseeno are both fast paced songs that I have sung.” A valiant defence, undoubtedly, but it still does not answer the question why songs like Beedi Jalaile have greater mass appeal? Are raunchy and overtly sexual songs sung with a raw voice more popular? “I don’t think that songs that are harshly sung are necessarily sensual. They do have mass appeal. However, there is an audience for every kind of music. It’s a different rasa of sorts,” says the frank, mellifluous crooner who has quite a substantial fan following of her own.
Does Shreya feel that the evolving character of heroines who are increasingly being portrayed as sexually and physically confident women has led to an evolution in the kind of voices being chosen for songs in films? Are deeper contraltos being preferred to coy sopranos? “It’s true that the character of the heroine in Indian cinema is evolving. However, we don’t have character specific or actor specific voices anymore. Music is being used to create an ambience or convey the predominant emotion in the movie. As we saw in Tare Zameen Par, Shankar Mahadevan’s voice was used to convey the character’s emotion in the song Ma instead of a child’s voice,” is Shreya’s response.
Although its true that voices aren’t character specific anymore, does Sunidhi Chauhan have an upper hand over Shreya when it comes to the evolution of the role of heroines in movies? The two music stars reign supreme in Bollywood at the moment. Both command loyal fan bases that often compare the two and argue over the Internet over who is better. Shreya is very amused over the thought of her fans defending her on the Internet. She sportingly replies, “ I am very happy that I have such loyal fans. About being compared with Sunidhi, I love the challenge of trying to win over fans loyal to her. This is the sort of healthy competition that keeps me going.”
As a parting shot, we asked Shreya a question that amused her quite a bit. After Himesh Reshamiya’s transformation and debut in films would she consider taking up acting any time in the future? “I don’t think so. I have been asked a couple of times by some well known directors but I declined their offer. It’s difficult to take a decision about such a thing. I can’t set aside a whole month of my schedule like a composer might be able to,” says the star who sounded a bit unsure about her decision. With her elegant looks and sweet voice we are sure her fans can’t wait to see her in a movie soon.
by Shivani Bail